How nice.  Edwards is at 15% in this poll, which means if Clinton is at 32% (and exactly where she was a year ago) she has more than doubled up on Edwards now.  Obama also lost 2% in this poll, so the result is the second double-digit margin poll we have seen (after Rasmussen's earlier this month.)   You are spinning that as a "bad result" for Clinton?   Dizzying.    If this poll is anywhere near accurate, it is terrible news for Edwards (the worst news possible) and then bad news for Obama next.  Crossing the double-digit margin for the second time in an Iowa poll is obviously good news for Clinton.